Literary Archetypes
Hero/Antihero: Gilgamesh suits both. He is viewed as a good king by his people or rather his people don’t seem to have a problem with him. He shows his power and strength by killing Humbaba. He also goes on a journey in search of the secret of immortality. Killing Humbaba and going on this journey are two main things that demonstrate Gilgamesh’s courage and also his determination. Howver, Gilgamesh can also be viewed as the antihero because of his loss of faith and hope in everything after Enkidu dies. After Enkidu’s death, Gilgamesh, although on a quest for immortality, does a lot of aimless wandering, sleeping, grieving, etc. The book says Gilgamesh wanders without a purpose; he is directionless. It isn’t until after his conversations and help from Utnapishtim that he undergoes a transformation that leaves him a more optimistic, changed man. This is what makes him an antihero as well as a hero.
The Wise Fool: The wise fool is Utnapishtim. He is a seemingly wise character in Gilgamesh, especially regarding his views on immortality. When Utnapishtim tells Gilgamesh the story of the great flood and how he was chosen to be immortal, but did not desire it, this displays the passing down of knowledge from Utnapishtim to Gilgamesh. Utnapishtim tells Gilgamesh that immortality or to be like the gods is not something to be desired. It is not, should not, be the place of men. Once you are immortal, there is also loneliness. Especially for Utnapishtim who lost all of his fellow people in the great flood.
The Devil Figure: Ishtar displays many “devilish” thought processes and actions in Gilgamesh. She is the one who wants to send the Bull of Heaven down to earth and kill three hundred men and kill Gilgamesh. She does this because Gilgamesh will not marry her. She is a very vengeful character, it seems. Also, she is an attributor to the great flood. She thinks it is a good idea to wipe out mankind; to put them in their proper place.
The Outcast: Enkidu is an alienated character both when he is living with the animals and when he becomes a “man;” a member of society. He is viewed as an outcast by the town of Uruk and by society when he is like an animal because he is a man who looks and acts as an animal would. He is stand-outish in that way. He also frees the hunter’s animals from the traps, and this makes the hunter want Enkidu to just become a man so that he will stop doing this. Thus the prostitute comes into play and makes Enkidu a supposed “man” by sleeping with him and taking his innocence. Now it’s the animals that view Enkidu as the outcast, the shameful one for sleeping with the prostitute and leaving behind a familiar and comfortable life to join in on the ways of society. So, really, the only place Enkidu ever fits in is with Gilgamesh, and that’s only for a short time.
The Double: I believe that although Ishtar is devilish, conniving, and vengeful, she also has a less dominant soft side in that she comes to realize the enormity of her impulsiveness, but only after she’s done something dreadfully wrong. An example would be when the great flood is sent down on mankind, she realizes that although men were in the wrong, to kill off all of mankind was a terribly rash and impulsive decision on her part. “Ishtar cried out like a woman at the height of labor: O how could I have wanted to do this to my people!” (pg. 78, Gilgamesh) This quote displays Ishtar’s softer side, which is definitely not a dominant characteristic of hers; at least not until she is seeing firsthand the effects of her actions.
The Scapegoat: Enkidu serves as the “sacrifice” or the scapegoat that appeases the gods. The gods say that either Gilgamesh or Enkidu must die on account that they killed both Humbaba and the Bull of Heaven. The gods choose Enkidu to die. One reason they do this is because he is already wounded, weakened by Humbaba. Another reason is because Gilgamesh is two thirds god, and apparently that excuses him from any kind of “punishment” like what Enkidu ends up receiving. Enkidu knows that the gods are going to choose him to die, and he doesn’t fight this knowledge or protest against it in anyway, but merely accepts it. He quietly fades away, and as he is dying, he sorrowfully speaks about how his life was before the prostitute took away his innocence; how he knew life in everything at one point in time.
The Temptress: I think the temptress is immortality itself, especially in this story. Immortality is what men strive for, what they crave. Even today, there are those who desire immortal life whether it be because they fear death, or for another reason. Immortality just seems to be an appealing idea to some. In Gilgamesh, only the gods have immortality, and when men begin to defy mortality and go in search of immortality, the gods are not very happy. This would mean that men would be like the gods, and then nothing would set the two apart. The gods send a great flood to wipe out mankind and put men back in their rightful place; to teach them a lesson. So, in desiring immortality and pursuing it, men brought forth their own destruction.
The Good Mother: Although Ninsun is literally a mother and is also protective and worried over Gilgamesh, (and also Enkidu) she is a smaller part and does less physically for Gilgamesh in nurturing and such. The character who nurtures, gives guidance, and all together helps Gilgamesh is Siduri, the barmaid he meets on his way to Utnapishtim. She rubs his back, bathes him, clothes him, feeds him, and lets him sleep and grieve for Enkidu.